Often considered responsible for turning a lot of people into... uh, "furries."
While cartoons weren't the ones responsible for for the... uh, "furriness, " they sure did offer a huge hand in it.
Disney's group is perhaps the biggest offender in this. They have a history of drawing anthropomorphic creatures; in fact, almost ALL their characters in the classic shorts and anything related to them(DuckTales, Goof Troop, Clubhouse, etc.) are anthropomorphic animals and monsters, a few of them being female. The "furriness" didn't really start till the 70's with some of their movies(The Rescuers, The Aristocats,
Robin Hood) and it really hit home in the 90's with their new shows. Gadget Hackwrench was popular enough to have a fricking CHURCH in Russia!
All dedicated to her likeness. Disney has many varieties to choose from. From Daisy Duck, to Rebecca Cunningham, to Brandy Harrington to Lambie, as well as many choices of species. Hell, even the Character Costumes at their theme parks are something to look oogle at. Case in point...
www.flickr.com/photos/10152427… Warner Bros' group isn't that far off either. Though, their classic characters may not have a bigger impact on the furry fandom compared to Disney(had less females than Disney, as well as more humans), it wasn't until the 90's that their material(the newer ones) have caught the attention of furries. It seems that every female creature Warner Bros had was just made to lust over, or, at least, had moments of this. The one exception that comes to my mind is Petunia Pig... or am I missing something?
Hanna-Barbera's group is more tamed in this in compare to the other mentioned two. Back then, it was just Cindy Bear, and even then, the artstyle was a case of YMMV. Though, they would later have characters like Callie Briggs and Penny Squirrel...
Lesser cartoons also apply. Someone did mention Cleo from Heathcliff. Either way, the whole furry thing isn't a bad thing, but as said, some do take a bit far.
Though, that can be said for any form of fandom.